When proving something, the most important aspect is the problem setting. This is because proof is an act based on arbitrary settings and is influenced by the premises.
Even if a logically correct answer is derived, if the requirements are not correctly input, the more logically correct the answer, the more incorrect it becomes.
To make a correct proof, appropriate problem setting and accurate information input are necessary. Therefore, data analysis spends a lot of time and effort on preprocessing. If preprocessing is appropriate, logical development requires neither much effort nor time.
One premise is related to the object or event to be proven. This is the premise concerning external existence. Another premise is related to the self, the party proving the matter. This is the premise concerning recognition. The third premise is related to the means of proof. This is the premise concerning logical means.
The premise concerning the object refers to material and external premises. In contrast, the premise concerning the self refers to the premises related to one’s recognition and ideas, such as purpose, perspective, position, values, and internal standards.
As for the means of proof, it involves premises related to whether the proof should be based on qualitative means, quantitative means, probabilistic means, or algebraic means.
In other words, proof is constructed from three points: the self, the object, and the standards.
To set the correct problem, it is necessary to reconstruct the other party’s problem setting by oneself and compare and verify it with the other party’s problem.
Responding to one’s own questions is evidence that the other party is unconsciously reconstructing the problem within themselves using their own logic. In other words, they are aligning their problem setting with yours and probing the true intent of your question. This is the usual way of recognition.
The important thing is to confirm the premises, and if the premises cannot be confirmed, the discussion will not align.
The ultimate premises lead to existence, recognition, and logic. The ultimate premises are difficult to agree upon among people with different beliefs. Compromise is difficult among Christians, Muslims, Jews, atheists, Buddhists, and Hindus.
Therefore, I thoroughly eliminate unnecessary parts and focus only on the remaining functions, positions, and relationships.
By doing so, it leads to the functions of existence, recognition, and logic. Only that remains. And existence is the external existence of the self and the existence of the self. Recognition arises from the relationship between the external existence of the self and the self.
Starting from here, equality (position), freedom (function), and love (relationship) are realized.
It only manifests through practice.
God does not speak.
He only shows.
Just thinking is not enough.
Just saying is not enough.
It will not be realized without action.
The self manifests in the external world only through actions via the body. Therefore, the proof of the existence of the self is possible only through actions.
In other words, the self cannot exist alone. At least, it cannot be recognized as an existence.
In conclusion, a person cannot exist alone, physically, biologically, or in terms of recognition.
From this relationship, the universality of love is proven. Without love, a person cannot exist. Therefore, I believe God is love. Because He shows that without love, existence is impossible. How to prove this is the current challenge.
Conclusion.
The nature of God is love.
What God desires is the realization of love.
Love is to acknowledge, forgive, believe, help each other, care for each other, be considerate, share joy, heal, and learn.
Love is a subjective and active act, so it cannot be realized without oneself, but one’s own ego hinders love .
It is difficult to practice.
Is it a mother’s love?
Love is devotion.
God shows the nature of love through mothers.
Love does not appear if one wants to be loved.
Love appears only by loving.